Navarro v. Florida Institute of Technology, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida·Decided May 19, 2023·No. 6:22-cv-01950·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

JOSHUA NAVARRO, BENJAMIN KOMITA, JADEN KREKOW, KYLE STEWART, MASON YASKOVIC, THOMAS FRANCIS, BRYCEN HANER, RYAN ZERNEKE, DAVID ADLER, ERIK LAARI, and REESE VAN PUTTEN,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No: 6:22-cv-1950-CEM-EJK

FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Defendant.

ORDER This cause comes before the Court on Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File a Proposed Protective Order (the “Motion”), filed May 3, 2023. (Doc. 73.) Upon consideration, the Motion is granted. In the motion, Defendant seeks leave to file a protective order with respect to the production of student education records that are otherwise protected from disclosure pursuant to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (“FERPA”)1. The purpose of FERPA is to “‘assure parents and students . . . that access

1 “ . . . [S]uch information is furnished in compliance with judicial order, or pursuant to any lawfully issued subpoena, upon condition that parents and the students are notified of to their education records and to protect such individuals’ right to privacy by limiting the transferability (and disclosure) of their records without their consent.’” Cafra v. RLI Ins. Co., No. 8:14-cv-843-T-17EAJ, 2015 WL 12844288, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 5, 2015) (citing Alig-Mielcarek v. Jackson, 286 F.R.D. 521, 525-26 (N.D. Ga. 2012)). Defendant states that the parties have agreed to a confidentiality agreement; however, the parties note that FERPA appears to require a court order to disclose information without student consent. (Doc. 73 at 2; see 20 U.S.C. § 1232g(b)(2)(B) (student consent not needed when “such information is furnished in compliance with a judicial order, or pursuant to any lawfully issued subpoena, upon condition that parents and the students are notified of all such orders or subpoenas in advance of the compliance therewith by the educational institution or agency.”).) Accordingly, Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File a Proposed Protective Order is GRANTED. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on May 19, 2023.

□□ KIDD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

all such orders or subpoenas in advance of the compliance therewith by the educational institution or agency... 20 U.S.C. § 1232g(b)(2)(B).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Navarro v. Florida Institute of Technology, Inc., (M.D. Fla. 2023).

Navarro v. Florida Institute of Technology, Inc. (Navarro v. Florida Institute of Technology, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alig-Mielcarek v. Jackson
286 F.R.D. 521 (N.D. Georgia, 2012)