Navarro v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Navarro v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC

130 So. 3d 775, 2014 WL 308050, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1020

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 29, 2014

DocketNo. 3D13-1560

StatusPublished

This text of 130 So. 3d 775 (Navarro v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Navarro v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC, 130 So. 3d 775, 2014 WL 308050, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1020 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ROTHENBERG, J.

Affirmed. See Zarate v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., 81 So.3d 556, 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (holding that it is the appellant’s burden to present a record to overcome the presumption of correctness of the trial court’s findings); 7550 Bldg., Inc. v. Atl. Rack & Shelving, Inc., 999 So.2d 663, 664 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (holding that the appellant’s failure to provide a transcript of the proceedings was fatal to its claims because “[without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not [sic] properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”) (quoting Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979)).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROTHENBERG, J.

Affirmed. See Zarate v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., 81 So.3d 556, 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (holding that it is the appellant’s burden to present a record to overcome the presumption of correctness of the trial court’s findings); 7550 Bldg., Inc. v. Atl. Rack & Shelving, Inc., 999 So.2d 663, 664 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (holding that the appellant’s failure to provide a transcript of the proceedings was fatal to its claims because “[without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not [sic] properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”) (quoting Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979)).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 So. 3d 775, 2014 WL 308050, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/navarro-v-aurora-loan-services-llc-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack