Navarro, Miguel Angel
This text of Navarro, Miguel Angel (Navarro, Miguel Angel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-82,264-03 and WR-82,264-04
EX PARTE MIGUEL ANGEL NAVARRO, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 08-DCR-050238-HC2 AND 10-DCR-050236A-HC2 IN THE 240TH DISTRICT COURT FROM FORT BEND COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex
parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and
aggravated assault. The convictions were affirmed on direct appeal. Navarro v. State, Nos. 01-11-
00139-CR; 01-11-00140-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 17, 2013) (not designated for
publication).
Applicant contends that Moon v. State, 451 S.W.3d 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014), which
concerned a juvenile transfer order, shows that the transfer of his case from juvenile to district court
was improper. The trial court recommends granting relief on the claim, and the State opposes. 2
Applicant also argues that there is new scientific evidence applicable to his case that shows the
State’s expert witness gave false testimony. The State disagrees, and trial court recommends denying
this claim.
We order that these applications be filed and set for submission. The parties shall brief
whether Applicant may rely on this Court’s opinion in Moon, which was delivered after Applicant’s
conviction became final, and if so, whether Applicant is entitled to habeas relief based on Moon. See
Ex Parte De Los Reyes, 392 S.W.3d 675 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Applicant’s remaining claims are
denied.
It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If that is not correct, the trial court shall
determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and desires to be represented by
counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art
26.04. The trial court shall send to this Court, within 60 days of the date of this order, a
supplemental transcript containing: a confirmation that Applicant is represented by counsel; the
order appointing counsel; or a statement that Applicant is not indigent. All briefs shall be filed with
this Court on or before 90 days from the date of this order.
Filed: January 25, 2017 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Navarro, Miguel Angel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/navarro-miguel-angel-texcrimapp-2017.