Navajero v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Navajero v. State

888 So. 2d 144

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 1, 2004

DocketNo. 3D04-26

StatusPublished

This text of 888 So. 2d 144 (Navajero v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Navajero v. State, 888 So. 2d 144 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Even assuming the correctness of our holding in Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), appeal docketed, No. SC 03-2103 (Fla. Nov. 10, 2003)(argued Oct. 7, 2004), that the Florida Sexual Predator Act, section 775.21, Florida Statutes (1999), is unconstitutional, contra Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), review granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla.2003)(argued Oct. 7, 2004); Reyes v. State, 854 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Therrien v. State, 859 So.2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Zaveta v. State, 856 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003), we find no merit in the present challenge to the validity of the quite different and less intrusive Sex Offender Registration Act, section 943.0435, Florida Statutes (2003). See Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84, 123 S.Ct. 1140, 155 L.Ed.2d 164 (2003); Connecticut Dep’t of Pub. Safety v. Doe, 538 U.S. 1, 123 S.Ct. 1160, 155 L.Ed.2d 98 (2003).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Even assuming the correctness of our holding in Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), appeal docketed, No. SC 03-2103 (Fla. Nov. 10, 2003)(argued Oct. 7, 2004), that the Florida Sexual Predator Act, section 775.21, Florida Statutes (1999), is unconstitutional, contra Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), review granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla.2003)(argued Oct. 7, 2004); Reyes v. State, 854 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Therrien v. State, 859 So.2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Zaveta v. State, 856 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003), we find no merit in the present challenge to the validity of the quite different and less intrusive Sex Offender Registration Act, section 943.0435, Florida Statutes (2003). See Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84, 123 S.Ct. 1140, 155 L.Ed.2d 164 (2003); Connecticut Dep’t of Pub. Safety v. Doe, 538 U.S. 1, 123 S.Ct. 1160, 155 L.Ed.2d 98 (2003).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

888 So. 2d 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/navajero-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack