Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Nava v. State

Nava v. State

852 So. 2d 327, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11745, 2003 WL 21800166
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 6, 2003
DocketNo. 4D03-2597
StatusPublished

This text of 852 So. 2d 327 (Nava v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nava v. State, 852 So. 2d 327, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11745, 2003 WL 21800166 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bernard Nava challenges the trial court’s denial of his rule 3.850 motion which was premised on newly discovered [328]*328evidence. The trial court denied the motion as successive.

Nava’s previous motion did not present the same issue. Nava v. State, 801 So.2d 945 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Compare Wright v. State, - So.2d -, 2003 WL 21511313 (Fla. July 3, 2003). We affirm however because Nava’s motion is legally insufficient. Jones v. State, 591 So.2d 911, 916 (Fla.1991).

FARMER, C.J., SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. State
591 So. 2d 911 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Wright v. State
857 So. 2d 861 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
852 So. 2d 327, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11745, 2003 WL 21800166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nava-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.