Nautilus Land Owners Corp. v. Gilbert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nautilus Land Owners Corp. v. Gilbert

253 A.D.2d 862, 678 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9814

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 28, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 253 A.D.2d 862 (Nautilus Land Owners Corp. v. Gilbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nautilus Land Owners Corp. v. Gilbert, 253 A.D.2d 862, 678 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to determine title to real property, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), entered July 1, 1997, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The defendants installed a fence around their property in 1982. That same year, the plaintiffs representative wrote to the defendants to inform them that their newly-installed fence was on the plaintiffs property and should be moved. The defendants never moved the fence. This action, which was commenced approximately 13 years later, is barred by the applicable 10-year Statute of Limitations (see, CPLR 212 [a]). Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to determine title to real property, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), entered July 1, 1997, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The defendants installed a fence around their property in 1982. That same year, the plaintiffs representative wrote to the defendants to inform them that their newly-installed fence was on the plaintiffs property and should be moved. The defendants never moved the fence. This action, which was commenced approximately 13 years later, is barred by the applicable 10-year Statute of Limitations (see, CPLR 212 [a]). Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D.2d 862, 678 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nautilus-land-owners-corp-v-gilbert-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack