Nautilus Insurance Company v. North Arkansas Wood, Inc.

429 F. App'x 629
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided September 20, 2011·No. 11-1151·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this diversity-based declaratory judgment action, North Arkansas Wood, Inc., and Jo Ann Petray appeal from the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment, in which the court concluded that Nautilus Insurance Company had no duty to defend them with respect to third-party claims asserted in Arkansas state-court litigation. Upon de novo review of the summary judgment decision and the district court’s interpretation of Arkansas law, see Pioneer Indus., Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 639 F.3d 461, 465 (8th Cir.2011) (standards of review), we affirm for the reasons discussed in the district court’s order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nautilus Insurance Company v. North Arkansas Wood, Inc., 429 F. App'x 629 (8th Cir. 2011).

429 F. App'x 629 (Nautilus Insurance Company v. North Arkansas Wood, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pioneer Industries, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance
639 F.3d 461 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)