Nautilus Insurance Company v. North Arkansas Wood, Inc.
This text of 429 F. App'x 629 (Nautilus Insurance Company v. North Arkansas Wood, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this diversity-based declaratory judgment action, North Arkansas Wood, Inc., and Jo Ann Petray appeal from the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment, in which the court concluded that Nautilus Insurance Company had no duty to defend them with respect to third-party claims asserted in Arkansas state-court litigation. Upon de novo review of the summary judgment decision and the district court’s interpretation of Arkansas law, see Pioneer Indus., Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 639 F.3d 461, 465 (8th Cir.2011) (standards of review), we affirm for the reasons discussed in the district court’s order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
429 F. App'x 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nautilus-insurance-company-v-north-arkansas-wood-inc-ca8-2011.