Nautilus Insurance Company v. Lexington Insurance Company
This text of 566 F. App'x 573 (Nautilus Insurance Company v. Lexington Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER **
In light of the Supreme Court of Hawaii’s decision addressing the certified questions in this case, the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants-Appellees and denying summary judgment to Plaintiff-Appellant is VACATED. This case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court of Hawaii’s decision in Nautilus Insurance Co. v. Lexington Ins. Co., 132 Hawai'i 283, 321 P.3d 634, No. SCCQ-12-0000977, 2014 WL 560805 (Haw. Feb. 13, 2014).
Each party shall bear its own costs on this appeal.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
566 F. App'x 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nautilus-insurance-company-v-lexington-insurance-company-ca9-2014.