Nautilus Insurance Co. v. Wrench Press, LLC

Missouri Court of Appeals

Nautilus Insurance Co. v. Wrench Press, LLC

513 S.W.3d 384, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 164, 2017 WL 971839

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 14, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104721

StatusPublished

This text of 513 S.W.3d 384 (Nautilus Insurance Co. v. Wrench Press, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nautilus Insurance Co. v. Wrench Press, LLC, 513 S.W.3d 384, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 164, 2017 WL 971839 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

[385]*385ORDER

PER CURIAM

In this interpleader action brought by Nautilus Insurance Company regarding certain insurance proceeds, defendants Pe-tar and Biscrica Grgic appeal the trial court’s determination that defendant Wrench Press, LLC, was the only defendant entitled to the interpleaded funds. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[385]*385ORDER

PER CURIAM

In this interpleader action brought by Nautilus Insurance Company regarding certain insurance proceeds, defendants Pe-tar and Biscrica Grgic appeal the trial court’s determination that defendant Wrench Press, LLC, was the only defendant entitled to the interpleaded funds. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

513 S.W.3d 384, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 164, 2017 WL 971839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nautilus-insurance-co-v-wrench-press-llc-moctapp-2017.