Naunton v. The Oregon

D. California

Naunton v. The Oregon

17 F. Cas. 1251, 1867 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159

DecidedMarch 22, 1867

StatusPublished

This text of 17 F. Cas. 1251 (Naunton v. The Oregon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Naunton v. The Oregon, 17 F. Cas. 1251, 1867 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159 (californiad 1867).

Pincite

Opinion

On the night of May 21st, 1866, about twenty miles from Carmen Island, the Oregon ran into and sunk the bark Kent, which was becalmed. Hence this libel. The steamer had all lights set required by the act of congress. The bark did not have her red and green lights set, as required by the act of parliament, which is identical with the act of congress. The bark was not discovered until the steamer was close upon her. The bark had a bright white light in her main rigging. Weather clear and sea calm. The captain saw the steamer some two miles off, but had no thought of a collision.

Held, that although the bark was in fault in not displaying the proper lights, still, under the circumstances, would the steamer have seen the bark if she had had the colored lights up? To apply the strict rule would be harsh. I hold, and shall, till otherwise instructed, that under the circumstances of a ship becalmed in a remote sea and in such weather, the damage to both ships must be divided.

Ordered, that the damage to both vessels be found and the libellants recover one-half that amount with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the night of May 21st, 1866, about twenty miles from Carmen Island, the Oregon ran into and sunk the bark Kent, which was becalmed. Hence this libel. The steamer had all lights set required by the act of congress. The bark did not have her red and green lights set, as required by the act of parliament, which is identical with the act of congress. The bark was not discovered until the steamer was close upon her. The bark had a bright white light in her main rigging. Weather clear and sea calm. The captain saw the steamer some two miles off, but had no thought of a collision.

Held, that although the bark was in fault in not displaying the proper lights, still, under the circumstances, would the steamer have seen the bark if she had had the colored lights up? To apply the strict rule would be harsh. I hold, and shall, till otherwise instructed, that under the circumstances of a ship becalmed in a remote sea and in such weather, the damage to both ships must be divided.

Ordered, that the damage to both vessels be found and the libellants recover one-half that amount with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 F. Cas. 1251, 1867 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naunton-v-the-oregon-californiad-1867.