Naunheim v. BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL

Missouri Court of Appeals

Naunheim v. BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL

247 S.W.3d 600, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 362, 2008 WL 708204

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 18, 2008

DocketED 89343

StatusPublished

This text of 247 S.W.3d 600 (Naunheim v. BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Naunheim v. BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL, 247 S.W.3d 600, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 362, 2008 WL 708204 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in defendant’s favor on plaintiffs claims for assault and battery and a judgment entered on a directed verdict in defendant’s favor on plaintiffs claim for false imprisonment. The evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in defendant’s favor on plaintiffs claims for assault and battery and a judgment entered on a directed verdict in defendant’s favor on plaintiffs claim for false imprisonment. The evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 S.W.3d 600, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 362, 2008 WL 708204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naunheim-v-barnes-jewish-hospital-moctapp-2008.