Home/U.S. Customs Court/Naumes Forwarding Service v. United States

Naumes Forwarding Service v. United States

62 Cust. Ct. 1075, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3363
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 17, 1969
DocketNo. P69/76; protests 66/77276-2824, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/77; protests 67/79083 and 67/79025 (Baltimore)
StatusPublished

This text of 62 Cust. Ct. 1075 (Naumes Forwarding Service v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Naumes Forwarding Service v. United States, 62 Cust. Ct. 1075, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3363 (cusc 1969).

Opinion

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers, trees, foliage, fruits, vegetables, grasses, or grains, and articles made of the foregoing, in chief value of plastic, assembled in the same manner as the merchandise the subject of Armbee Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and Zunold Trading Corporation et al v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Armbee Corp. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 105 (U.S. Customs Court, 1968)
Zunold Trading Corp. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 112 (U.S. Customs Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Cust. Ct. 1075, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naumes-forwarding-service-v-united-states-cusc-1969.