Naumes Forwarding Service v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 352
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Naumes Forwarding Service v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 Cust. Ct. 509
United States Customs Court·Decided July 10, 1957·No. No. 61016; protest 235615-K/6117 (Chicago)·Published

Opinion

[353]*353Opinion by

Olives, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that jthe merchandise consists of buckles and lighters similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 57300, the merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to June 6, 1951, was held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 1527 (c) (2), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), and that entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after June 6, 1951, was held dutiable at 35 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52759), as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Naumes Forwarding Service v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 352 (cusc 1957).

39 Cust. Ct. 352 (Naumes Forwarding Service v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.