Naul v. Naul

New York Supreme Court

Naul v. Naul

32 Misc. 647, 66 N.Y.S. 447

DecidedNovember 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 32 Misc. 647 (Naul v. Naul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Naul v. Naul, 32 Misc. 647, 66 N.Y.S. 447 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Gaynor, J.:

The proposed amendments of the defendants (respondents) striking out the statement of the exceptions taken by' the plaintiffs (appellants) on the trial to the admission or exclusion of evidence are allowed. The plaintiffs having prevailed on the trial, their exceptions are now of no use, and the statements of them in the appeal record would he mere verbiage. The motion on the minutes by the defendants for a new trial was granted, and this is an appeal from that order. The case must contain all of the evidence, and any exceptions by the defendants which they may deem important, as the motion may have been granted on such exceptions. But it could not have been granted on the plaintiffs’ exceptions.

Case settled accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gaynor, J.:

The proposed amendments of the defendants (respondents) striking out the statement of the exceptions taken by' the plaintiffs (appellants) on the trial to the admission or exclusion of evidence are allowed. The plaintiffs having prevailed on the trial, their exceptions are now of no use, and the statements of them in the appeal record would he mere verbiage. The motion on the minutes by the defendants for a new trial was granted, and this is an appeal from that order. The case must contain all of the evidence, and any exceptions by the defendants which they may deem important, as the motion may have been granted on such exceptions. But it could not have been granted on the plaintiffs’ exceptions.

Case settled accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 Misc. 647, 66 N.Y.S. 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naul-v-naul-nysupct-1900.