Naugle v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Naugle v. State

511 So. 2d 282, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 330, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2028

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJuly 2, 1987

DocketNo. 69734

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 511 So. 2d 282 (Naugle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Naugle v. State, 511 So. 2d 282, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 330, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2028 (Fla. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

EHRLICH, Justice.

We have for review Naugle v. State, 497 So.2d 664, 665 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) in which the Second District Court of Appeal certified the following question:

DOES FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.191(b)(1) APPLY TO PERSONS HELD IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS SOLELY ON THE BASIS OF CHARGES PENDING IN THIS STATE?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

Consistent with our recent decision in State v. Bivona, 496 So.2d 130 (Fla.1986), the district court below concluded that Rule 3.191(b)(1) does so apply. Accordingly, the decision below is approved.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI