Naugle v. State

511 So. 2d 282, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 330, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2028
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 2, 1987·No. No. 69734·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

EHRLICH, Justice.

We have for review Naugle v. State, 497 So.2d 664, 665 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) in which the Second District Court of Appeal certified the following question:

DOES FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.191(b)(1) APPLY TO PERSONS HELD IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS SOLELY ON THE BASIS OF CHARGES PENDING IN THIS STATE?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

Consistent with our recent decision in State v. Bivona, 496 So.2d 130 (Fla.1986), the district court below concluded that Rule 3.191(b)(1) does so apply. Accordingly, the decision below is approved.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Naugle v. State, 511 So. 2d 282, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 330, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2028 (Fla. 1987).

511 So. 2d 282 (Naugle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Riley v. State
511 So. 2d 282 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)