Naughton v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

588 A.2d 461, 246 N.J. Super. 649, 1991 N.J. Super. LEXIS 69
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedFebruary 6, 1991
StatusPublished

This text of 588 A.2d 461 (Naughton v. Zoning Board of Adjustment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Naughton v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 588 A.2d 461, 246 N.J. Super. 649, 1991 N.J. Super. LEXIS 69 (N.J. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff attacks the constitutional validity of L. 1989, c. 67, N.J.S.A. 40:55D-68.1 to 68.3. He argues that it is special legislation and violates the constitutional guarantees of due process and equal protection. The Law Division granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Burton L. Fundler in [650]*650his opinion of October 20, 1989, which may be found at 246 N.J.Super. 644, 588 A.2d 459.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Naughton v. Borough of Spring Lake
588 A.2d 459 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
588 A.2d 461, 246 N.J. Super. 649, 1991 N.J. Super. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naughton-v-zoning-board-of-adjustment-njsuperctappdiv-1991.