Naughton v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
588 A.2d 461, 246 N.J. Super. 649, 1991 N.J. Super. LEXIS 69
Opinion
Plaintiff attacks the constitutional validity of L. 1989, c. 67, N.J.S.A. 40:55D-68.1 to 68.3. He argues that it is special legislation and violates the constitutional guarantees of due process and equal protection. The Law Division granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Burton L. Fundler in [650]*650his opinion of October 20, 1989, which may be found at 246 N.J.Super. 644, 588 A.2d 459.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Naughton v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 588 A.2d 461, 246 N.J. Super. 649, 1991 N.J. Super. LEXIS 69 (N.J. Ct. App. 1991).
588 A.2d 461 (Naughton v. Zoning Board of Adjustment) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Naughton v. Borough of Spring Lake
588 A.2d 459 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1989)