Naughton v. Laclede Gaslight Co.

100 S.W. 1104, 123 Mo. App. 192, 1907 Mo. App. LEXIS 295
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 19, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 100 S.W. 1104 (Naughton v. Laclede Gaslight Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Naughton v. Laclede Gaslight Co., 100 S.W. 1104, 123 Mo. App. 192, 1907 Mo. App. LEXIS 295 (Mo. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

GOODE, J.

This plaintiff is the widow of Patrick Naughton, deceased. While removing ashes from under a boiler in defendant’s gas factory her husband was [196]*196burned so badly that he died four days afterwards. This action was instituted to recover $5,000 damages on account of his death, caused, it is charged, by defendant’s negligence. At one of its gas factories in St. Louis defendant had six boilers about twenty-one feet in length, set side by side. Under each boiler was a furnace. These six furnaces were separated by brick walls twenty-two inches thick and fifty-one inches long. In the front or north end of each furnace was a fire box with a cinder box beneath and a grate on top. Behind the fire box and fifty-one inches back from the front end of the boiler, stood a brick wall built across the boiler and to within about a foot of its convex under surface. This partition was called the “Bridge Wall.” Immediately behind the bridge wall was an ash pit or combustion chamber. This compartment was nine feet long, six feet wide and four and one-half feet in depth from the bottom of the boiler to the floor. Behind the ash pit was another transverse brick wall two and one-half feet high and behind it a chamber called the “mud drum,” which was under the rear of the boiler and extended nine feet to its south end. It was about two feet in depth. When the furnace was in blast the flames streamed from the fire box in front, through the ash chamber and mud drum and thence to the flues in the rear of the boiler. The arrangement of the furnace and boiler will be understood from this cut:

[197]*197

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dillon v. Weinberg
260 S.W. 809 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1924)
Batesell v. American Zinc, Lead & Smelting Co.
176 S.W. 446 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1915)
Howard v. Scarritt Estate Co.
144 S.W. 185 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1912)
Reynolds v. Publishers: George Knapp & Co.
135 S.W. 103 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 S.W. 1104, 123 Mo. App. 192, 1907 Mo. App. LEXIS 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naughton-v-laclede-gaslight-co-moctapp-1907.