Natzke v. City of Fayetteville

684 S.W.2d 264, 285 Ark. 88, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 1826
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedFebruary 25, 1985
DocketCR 84-183
StatusPublished

This text of 684 S.W.2d 264 (Natzke v. City of Fayetteville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Natzke v. City of Fayetteville, 684 S.W.2d 264, 285 Ark. 88, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 1826 (Ark. 1985).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant was convicted of DWI under Act 549 of 1983. On appeal his single assignment of error is that the act violates the separation of powers doctrine under the Arkansas Constitution. That argument has been considered and rejected. Sparrow v. State, 284 Ark. 396, 683 S.W.2d 218 (1985) and Lovell v. State, 283 Ark. 425, 678 S.W.2d 318 (1984).

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sparrow v. State
683 S.W.2d 218 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1985)
Lovell v. State
678 S.W.2d 318 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
684 S.W.2d 264, 285 Ark. 88, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 1826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/natzke-v-city-of-fayetteville-ark-1985.