Natzke v. City of Fayetteville

684 S.W.2d 264, 285 Ark. 88, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 1826
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided February 25, 1985·No. CR 84-183·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant was convicted of DWI under Act 549 of 1983. On appeal his single assignment of error is that the act violates the separation of powers doctrine under the Arkansas Constitution. That argument has been considered and rejected. Sparrow v. State, 284 Ark. 396, 683 S.W.2d 218 (1985) and Lovell v. State, 283 Ark. 425, 678 S.W.2d 318 (1984).

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Natzke v. City of Fayetteville, 684 S.W.2d 264, 285 Ark. 88, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 1826 (Ark. 1985).

684 S.W.2d 264 (Natzke v. City of Fayetteville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sparrow v. State
683 S.W.2d 218 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1985)
Lovell v. State
678 S.W.2d 318 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1984)