NatWest Bank N. A. v. Grauberd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

NatWest Bank N. A. v. Grauberd

251 A.D.2d 235, 674 N.Y.S.2d 592, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7723

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 25, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D.2d 235 (NatWest Bank N. A. v. Grauberd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

NatWest Bank N. A. v. Grauberd, 251 A.D.2d 235, 674 N.Y.S.2d 592, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7723 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart Cohen, J.), entered December 2, 1997, which denied the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and as so modified, affirmed, with costs payable to plaintiff.

Upon review of the evidentiary materials submitted, including the substantial discovery defendants sought and obtained from NatWest and several nonparties regarding their “commercial reasonableness” defense, we perceive no issue of fact regarding this defense. The conduct of plaintiff bank with respect to the collateral was commercially reasonable as a matter of law. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Tom, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart Cohen, J.), entered December 2, 1997, which denied the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and as so modified, affirmed, with costs payable to plaintiff.

Upon review of the evidentiary materials submitted, including the substantial discovery defendants sought and obtained from NatWest and several nonparties regarding their “commercial reasonableness” defense, we perceive no issue of fact regarding this defense. The conduct of plaintiff bank with respect to the collateral was commercially reasonable as a matter of law. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Tom, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D.2d 235, 674 N.Y.S.2d 592, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/natwest-bank-n-a-v-grauberd-nyappdiv-1998.