Natural Therapy Acupuncture, P.C. v. General Motors Assur. Co.
This text of Natural Therapy Acupuncture, P.C. v. General Motors Assur. Co. (Natural Therapy Acupuncture, P.C. v. General Motors Assur. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
General Motors Assurance Company, Respondent.
The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant. Freiberg, Peck & Kang, LLP (Yilo J. Kang, Esq.), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Ulysses Bernard Leverett, J.), entered May 20, 2014. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
For the reasons stated in Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Luc Jean Baptiste v New S. Ins. Co. (___ Misc 3d ___, 2017 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2014-1506 Q C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: September 15, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Natural Therapy Acupuncture, P.C. v. General Motors Assur. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/natural-therapy-acupuncture-pc-v-general-motors-assur-co-nyappterm-2017.