Natural Organics, Inc. v. Stafford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Natural Organics, Inc. v. Stafford

38 A.D.3d 630, 830 N.Y.S.2d 667

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.3d 630 (Natural Organics, Inc. v. Stafford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Natural Organics, Inc. v. Stafford, 38 A.D.3d 630, 830 N.Y.S.2d 667 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), dated January 19, 2006, as granted those branches of the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) which were to dismiss the first and fourth causes of action and so much of the second, third, and fifth causes of action insofar as asserted against the defendant Nature’s Way Products, Inc.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and those branches of the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) which were to dismiss the first and fourth causes of action and so much of the second, third, and fifth causes of action insofar as asserted against the defendant Nature’s Way Products, Inc., are denied (see Natural Organics, Inc. v Smith, 38 AD3d 628 [2007] [decided herewith]). Crane, J.P, Krausman, Fisher and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), dated January 19, 2006, as granted those branches of the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) which were to dismiss the first and fourth causes of action and so much of the second, third, and fifth causes of action insofar as asserted against the defendant Nature’s Way Products, Inc.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and those branches of the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) which were to dismiss the first and fourth causes of action and so much of the second, third, and fifth causes of action insofar as asserted against the defendant Nature’s Way Products, Inc., are denied (see Natural Organics, Inc. v Smith, 38 AD3d 628 [2007] [decided herewith]). Crane, J.P, Krausman, Fisher and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.3d 630, 830 N.Y.S.2d 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/natural-organics-inc-v-stafford-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack