Home/Third Circuit/Natural Footwear Limited v. Hart, Schaffner & Marx

Natural Footwear Limited v. Hart, Schaffner & Marx

620 F.2d 289
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 21, 1980·No. 79-2819·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

620 F.2d 289

Natural Footwear Limited
v.
Hart, Schaffner & Marx

79-2819

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit

3/21/80

D.N.J.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Natural Footwear Limited v. Hart, Schaffner & Marx, 620 F.2d 289 (3d Cir. 1980).

620 F.2d 289 (Natural Footwear Limited v. Hart, Schaffner & Marx) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Natural Footwear Limited, a Corporation of the Province of Ontario Canada v. Hart, Schaffner & Marx, a New York Corporation, and Roots, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation. Roots, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, Counterclaimant v. Don Green and Michael Budman, Individuals, and Natural Footwear Limited, a Corporation of the Province of Ontario, Canada, Counterdefendants. Appeal of Natural Footwear Limited, Don Green, and Michael Budman, and Counterclaim Natural Footwear Limited, a Corporation of the Province of Ontario Canada v. Hart, Schaffner & Marx, a New York Corporation, and Roots, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation. Roots, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, Counterclaimant v. Don Green and Michael Budman, Individuals, and Natural Footwear Limited, a Corporation of the Province of Ontario, Canada, Counterdefendants. Appeal of Hart, Schaffner & Marx and Defendant-Counterclaimant Roots, Inc
760 F.2d 1383 (Third Circuit, 1985)
Natural Footwear Ltd. v. Hart, Schaffner & Marx
760 F.2d 1383 (Third Circuit, 1985)