Nat's Pizzeria, Inc. v. 165 Lexington Avenue Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nat's Pizzeria, Inc. v. 165 Lexington Avenue Associates

304 A.D.2d 389, 757 N.Y.S.2d 548, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3871

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 10, 2003·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered November 20, 2001, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant landlord was properly granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint alleging causes for breach of contract and fraud. Plaintiff tenant’s breach of contract cause was demonstrably without merit as the evidence showed that plaintiff accepted the leased premises in “as is” condition after having been afforded several opportunities for their inspection, and that it was plaintiff, rather than defendant, that had assumed responsibility pursuant to the lease for making any structural alterations in the premises necessary to render them suitable for use as a restaurant.

In light of plaintiff’s acceptance of the premises in “as is” condition after full opportunity for inspection, and because converting the premises to a restaurant required substantial structural alteration, the extent of which was, according to plaintiff’s own consulting engineer, not dependent upon the condition of the premises’ second floor wood beam support structure, plaintiff has no sustainable claim that any representation by defendant as to the condition of that wooden support [390] structure was material to its decision to enter into the lease and, accordingly, plaintiffs claim for fraud must fail (cf. Jo Ann Homes at Bellmore v Dworetz, 25 NY2d 112 [1969]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered November 20, 2001, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant landlord was properly granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint alleging causes for breach of contract and fraud. Plaintiff tenant’s breach of contract cause was demonstrably without merit as the evidence showed that plaintiff accepted the leased premises in “as is” condition after having been afforded several opportunities for their inspection, and that it was plaintiff, rather than defendant, that had assumed responsibility pursuant to the lease for making any structural alterations in the premises necessary to render them suitable for use as a restaurant.

In light of plaintiff’s acceptance of the premises in “as is” condition after full opportunity for inspection, and because converting the premises to a restaurant required substantial structural alteration, the extent of which was, according to plaintiff’s own consulting engineer, not dependent upon the condition of the premises’ second floor wood beam support structure, plaintiff has no sustainable claim that any representation by defendant as to the condition of that wooden support [390] structure was material to its decision to enter into the lease and, accordingly, plaintiffs claim for fraud must fail (cf. Jo Ann Homes at Bellmore v Dworetz, 25 NY2d 112 [1969]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.

Nat's Pizzeria, Inc. v. 165 Lexington Avenue Associates, 304 A.D.2d 389, 757 N.Y.S.2d 548, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

304 A.D.2d 389 (Nat's Pizzeria, Inc. v. 165 Lexington Avenue Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related