Natrella v. Terenzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Natrella v. Terenzi

236 A.D.2d 569, 654 N.Y.S.2d 650, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1588

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 20, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 236 A.D.2d 569 (Natrella v. Terenzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Natrella v. Terenzi, 236 A.D.2d 569, 654 N.Y.S.2d 650, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1588 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding, inter alia, to strike the notice of caucus filed by Saverio Terenzi and Jennifer Troy, and enjoin them from holding a caucus on behalf of the Conservative Party for the purpose of nominating candidates for Mayor and for Village Trustee in the 1997 election for the Village of Port Chester, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), entered February 3, 1997, which, inter alia, granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In light of the " 'general policy of noninterference with the internal workings of a political party’ ” and the refusal of the courts to interfere with the proper exercise of powers delegated to a political committee under particular rules (Matter of Stewart v Natrella, 217 AD2d 599, 600; Matter of Bachmann v Coyne, 99 AD2d 742), this Court declines to interfere with the petitioners’ determination not to authorize a caucus. Sullivan, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding, inter alia, to strike the notice of caucus filed by Saverio Terenzi and Jennifer Troy, and enjoin them from holding a caucus on behalf of the Conservative Party for the purpose of nominating candidates for Mayor and for Village Trustee in the 1997 election for the Village of Port Chester, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), entered February 3, 1997, which, inter alia, granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In light of the " 'general policy of noninterference with the internal workings of a political party’ ” and the refusal of the courts to interfere with the proper exercise of powers delegated to a political committee under particular rules (Matter of Stewart v Natrella, 217 AD2d 599, 600; Matter of Bachmann v Coyne, 99 AD2d 742), this Court declines to interfere with the petitioners’ determination not to authorize a caucus. Sullivan, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D.2d 569, 654 N.Y.S.2d 650, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/natrella-v-terenzi-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack