Natowitz v. Niagara Falls Memorial Park Cemetery Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Natowitz v. Niagara Falls Memorial Park Cemetery Ass'n

235 A.D. 656

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, on the grounds: First, that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence, whatever view may be taken of it; and second, that the evidence shows that the plaintiff was acting as a real estate broker and failed to prove that he was licensed as such. All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, on the grounds: First, that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence, whatever view may be taken of it; and second, that the evidence shows that the plaintiff was acting as a real estate broker and failed to prove that he was licensed as such. All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Natowitz v. Niagara Falls Memorial Park Cemetery Ass'n, 235 A.D. 656 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

235 A.D. 656 (Natowitz v. Niagara Falls Memorial Park Cemetery Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related