Natl. Wildlife Fedn. v. Korleski

Ohio Supreme Court

Natl. Wildlife Fedn. v. Korleski

999 N.E.2d 702, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1449

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 26, 2013·No. 2013-1863·Published

Opinion

Franklin App. Nos. 12AP-278, 12AP-279, 12AP-280, and 12AP-281, 2013-Ohio-3923. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Neil S. Kagan, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. Nos. 12AP-278, 12AP-279, 12AP-280, and 12AP-281, 2013-Ohio-3923. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Neil S. Kagan, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Natl. Wildlife Fedn. v. Korleski, 999 N.E.2d 702, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1449 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

999 N.E.2d 702 (Natl. Wildlife Fedn. v. Korleski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.