Natl. Roofing Co. v. Erie Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Natl. Roofing Co. v. Erie Railroad

171 A.D. 887, 155 N.Y.S. 1127

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 171 A.D. 887 (Natl. Roofing Co. v. Erie Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Natl. Roofing Co. v. Erie Railroad, 171 A.D. 887, 155 N.Y.S. 1127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented upon the ground: 1. That under all the facts and circumstances there was a question of fact as to whether at the time the goods arrived and were tendered by the railroad company and taken by the plaintiff it was the owner and holder of the bill of lading and had title to the property. 2. That if any amendment to the complaint was necessary the trial court had ample power to allow the same.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented upon the ground: 1. That under all the facts and circumstances there was a question of fact as to whether at the time the goods arrived and were tendered by the railroad company and taken by the plaintiff it was the owner and holder of the bill of lading and had title to the property. 2. That if any amendment to the complaint was necessary the trial court had ample power to allow the same.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 A.D. 887, 155 N.Y.S. 1127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/natl-roofing-co-v-erie-railroad-nyappdiv-1915.