Nat'l. Col. Aid Soc. v. State Ex. Rel. Wilson, Pros.

196 N.E. 240, 208 Ind. 380, 1935 Ind. LEXIS 236
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 11, 1935
DocketNo. 26,225.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 196 N.E. 240 (Nat'l. Col. Aid Soc. v. State Ex. Rel. Wilson, Pros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nat'l. Col. Aid Soc. v. State Ex. Rel. Wilson, Pros., 196 N.E. 240, 208 Ind. 380, 1935 Ind. LEXIS 236 (Ind. 1935).

Opinion

Hughes, J.

—As stated by the appellant, this was an action brought by the State of Indiana on the relation of Herbert E. Wilson, prosecuting attorney for the 19th Judicial District of the State of Indiana against the National Colored Aid Society in the form of an information to the Circuit Court of Marion county, Indiana, whereby the State of Indiana on the relation of Herbert E. Wilson, prosecutor, contended that the appellant herein was violating its charter as a corporation organized under the so-called non-profit act of 1889, in that the appellant was in effect writing insurance, and that under its charter it had no right to engage in the enterprise, for the reason that the appellant corporation in so acting was engaged in a commercial enterprise and in a profit-making enterprise.

The information further contended that the agents of the appellant company were making misrepresentations to those whom they solicited for membership. It also contended that the appellant corporation had not complied with the law of Indiana, by providing for reserve in the payment of losses as prescribed by the insurance law of the State of Indiana.

It further contended that the large numbers of people were subscribing to the membership of the appellant corporation, believing it to be insurance, and asked that the franchise of the appellant corporation be forfeited and the corporation dissolved and its officers and agents be enjoined from soliciting, selling, issuing, and executing said contracts.

The appellant filed an answer of general denial to the complaint and the cause was submitted to the court upon an agreed stipulation of facts. The court found against the appellant and permanently enjoined it from *383 the sale, collection of, execution, and/or delivery of membership contracts, and ordered that the charter of the corporation be forfeited.

A motion for a new trial was filed by appellant and overruled by the court. The errors relied on for reversal, and properly assigned, are as follows:

(1) The decision of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence.

(2) The decision of the court is contrary to law.

The correctness of the decision and judgment of the court depends upon the agreed statement of facts, and it therefore becomes necessary to set out those facts stipulated material to a proper consideration of the case.

The parties’ stipulated facts are as follows:

“2. That said defendant is a corporation duly incorporated on August 8, 1930, under the laws of the State of Indiana, governing the incorporation of societies, associations and clubs not for pecuniary profit, Acts of 1889, page 141, approved March 6, 1889, entitled: ‘An act for the incorporation of societies not for pecuniary profit, defining their powers and providing for the election of directors, the dissolution of such corporation, distribution of their property, and the changing of their articles of association, and declaring an emergency.’

“3. That a copy of the articles of association as originally filed and now on file with the Secretary of State of Indiana by said defendant corporation is attached hereto, made a part hereof and marked ‘Exhibit A.’ That said articles of incorporation so filed with the Secretary of State were duly recorded in the office of the Recorder of Marion county, Indiana, on the 14th day of August, 1930, at the hour of 9:40 o’clock a. m., as appears of record therein, Miscellaneous Record 224, page 397.

“4. That said defendant corporation is now and has *384 been since said date o£ its said incorporation engaged in the business of soliciting and securing membership certificates in the State of Indiana and elsewhere from numerous persons of the Negro race, and is now and has been soliciting and securing membership certifiates from numerous persons of the Negro race in said State of Indiana and elsewhere during said period of time, in all things like to a blank copy of same attached hereto, made a part hereof and marked ‘Exhibit B.’

“5. That said ‘Exhibit B’ shall be taken and accepted as the exact membership certificate and contract which at all times mentioned herein has been duly executed and issued by the officers of said defendant corporation to its members in Indiana and elsewhere.

“6. That at all times mentioned herein the by-laws of said defendant corporation were and are the same as a copy of the same attached hereto, made a part hereof and marked ‘Exhibit C.’

“7. That said defendant corporation at all times herein mentioned has continuously maintained offices in the State of Indiana and has continuously employed officers and employes at stipulated salaries, wages and commissions in the conduct of its business.

“8. That said defendant corporation maintains no fund for the payment of benefits to its members created by payments by its members other than those paid pursuant to the provisions of said membership certificate and said by-laws.

“9. That when said membership certificate is issued by said corporation, the applicant member pays a membership fee for the issuance of said certificate, and that any and all payments made by any member and received under the terms of said certificates of membership paid to said corporation are in addition to said membership fee paid by the member at the time of his application *385 for membership, and said defendant corporation’s issuance to him of said membership certificate.

‘TO. That said defendant corporation has been and is now employing numerous and various agents in the State of Indiana and other states within the United States for the solicitation of such membership eertifiates and that said agents receive as compensation for such solicitation the membership fee provided in said membership certificates.

“11. That in addition to losses paid under said membership certificate the salaries of officers and employes of defendant corporation and the operating expense of the corporation are paid out of payments made by the members under and pursuant to the provisions of said membership certificates and said by-laws, and that said defendant corporation has heretofore called for said payments from its membership, will continue to call for payments from its membership as the need for payment arises, all under and pursuant to the terms of said membership certificate and said by-laws in the State of Indiana and elsewhere at all times herein mentioned.

“12. That said defendant corporation is not now and never has been licensed as an insurance company or association under the laws of the State of Indiana relating to and governing insurance companies, nor has it at any time ever applied for or received such a license.

“13. That said defendant corporation has no means or fund for the payment of losses sustained by any of its members pursuant to the terms of said membership certificate other than the fund created as hereinabove stated and has provided for no reserve for the payment of any losses pursuant to the terms of said membership certificate, and that said defendant corporation has no *386

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Candell v. United States
189 F.2d 442 (Tenth Circuit, 1951)
Karvalsky v. Becker
29 N.E.2d 560 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1940)
Miccolis v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'n
115 F.2d 579 (Seventh Circuit, 1940)
International Service Union Co. v. People Ex Rel. Wettengel
70 P.2d 431 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 N.E. 240, 208 Ind. 380, 1935 Ind. LEXIS 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/natl-col-aid-soc-v-state-ex-rel-wilson-pros-ind-1935.