NAT'L BISCUIT CO. v. State
This text of 11 N.Y.2d 743 (NAT'L BISCUIT CO. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
National Biscuit Company, Appellant,
v.
State of New York, Respondent. (Claim No. 34915.)
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
George R. Fearon and James A. Martin for appellant.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Julius L. Sackman and Paxton Blair of counsel), for respondent.
Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER.
Judgment affirmed, with costs (Selig v. State of New York, 10 N Y 2d 34). This court certifies that there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: the appellant contended that it has been deprived of its property without just compensation in violation of due process and that the alleged appropriation constituted an impairment of its contractual rights under the Constitution of the United States. This court held that appellant's constitutional rights had not been violated. No opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 N.Y.2d 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/natl-biscuit-co-v-state-ny-1962.