Natixis North America, LLC v. Payner

101 A.D.3d 509, 954 N.Y.2d 878

Opinion

The arbitral award was properly confirmed in the absence of a showing that the arbitrators manifestly disregarded the law (see Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, 480-481 [2006], cert dismissed 548 US 940 [2006]; Cantor Fitzgerald Sec. v Refco Sec., LLC, 83 AD3d 592, 593 [1st Dept 2011]). There is no basis to conclude that the arbitrators ignored law which is “well defined, explicit, and clearly applicable to the case,” as required to vacate an arbitral award under the “manifest disregard” standard (Wien, 6 NY3d at 481). Concur— Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Renwick and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Natixis North America, LLC v. Payner, 101 A.D.3d 509, 954 N.Y.2d 878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

101 A.D.3d 509 (Natixis North America, LLC v. Payner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wien & Malkin LLP v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.
548 U.S. 940 (Supreme Court, 2006)
Wien & Malkin LLP v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.
846 N.E.2d 1201 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
Cantor Fitzgerald Securities v. Refco Securities, LLC
83 A.D.3d 592 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)