Native American Arts v. Hartford Casualty

Seventh Circuit

Native American Arts v. Hartford Casualty

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedFebruary 14, 2006

Docket04-3861

StatusPublished

This text of Native American Arts v. Hartford Casualty (Native American Arts v. Hartford Casualty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Native American Arts v. Hartford Casualty, (7th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

February 14, 2006

Before

Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

NATIVE AMERICAN ARTS, INCORPORATED, ] Appeal from the United an Illinois Corporation, as the ] States District Court for assignee of Bloom Brothers, a ] the Northern District of Division of Stravina Operating ] Illinois, Eastern Division. Company, L.L.C., ] Plaintiff-Appellant, ] No. 03 C 7233 ] No. 04-3861 v. ] Charles P. Kocoras, ] Chief Judge. HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE ] COMPANY, an Indiana Corporation, ] and HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY ] OF THE MIDWEST, an Indiana ] Corporation, ] Defendants-Appellees. ] ]

Upon consideration of the PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT’S MOTION TO CORRECT COURT’S JANUARY 25, 2006 OPINION, filed on February 9, 2006, by counsel for the appellant,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The opinion issued on January 25, 2006, is AMENDED as follows: The second sentence of the second paragraph on page 3 shall be replace by the following sentence: “Stravina paid NAA $300,000 and agreed on a “settlement value” for NAA of $6 million, which NAA could seek through an assignment of Stravina’s rights under its old insurance policies.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

February 14, 2006

Before

Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

NATIVE AMERICAN ARTS, INCORPORATED, ] Appeal from the United an Illinois Corporation, as the ] States District Court for assignee of Bloom Brothers, a ] the Northern District of Division of Stravina Operating ] Illinois, Eastern Division. Company, L.L.C., ] Plaintiff-Appellant, ] No. 03 C 7233 ] No. 04-3861 v. ] Charles P. Kocoras, ] Chief Judge. HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE ] COMPANY, an Indiana Corporation, ] and HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY ] OF THE MIDWEST, an Indiana ] Corporation, ] Defendants-Appellees. ] ]

Upon consideration of the PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT’S MOTION TO CORRECT COURT’S JANUARY 25, 2006 OPINION, filed on February 9, 2006, by counsel for the appellant,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The opinion issued on January 25, 2006, is AMENDED as follows: The second sentence of the second paragraph on page 3 shall be replace by the following sentence: “Stravina paid NAA $300,000 and agreed on a “settlement value” for NAA of $6 million, which NAA could seek through an assignment of Stravina’s rights under its old insurance policies.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Native American Arts v. Hartford Casualty, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/native-american-arts-v-hartford-casualty-ca7-2006.