Native Alliance Corp. v. Oneida Retail Division

8 Am. Tribal Law 424
CourtOneida Appellate Court
DecidedMay 21, 2009
DocketNo. 09-AC-005
StatusPublished

This text of 8 Am. Tribal Law 424 (Native Alliance Corp. v. Oneida Retail Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oneida Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Native Alliance Corp. v. Oneida Retail Division, 8 Am. Tribal Law 424 (oneidactapp 2009).

Opinion

Judicial Officers Winnifred L. Thomas, Anita F. Barber, Linda Cornelius (pro tem), Janice L. McLester, and Lois Powless presiding.

Final Decision

This case has come before the Oneida Tribal Judicial System, Appellate Court.

I Background

This case is an appeal of a trial court decision, 08-TC-117, involving the same parties. The trial court dismissed the action as being untimely filed. Appellant Native Alliance filed an appeal. The Appellate Court now dismisses the appeal as untimely filed.

The Oneida Tribal Judicial System has jurisdiction over this appeal by virtue of Sec. 1.11-1 of the Administrative Procedures Act which permits appeal of a final decision in a contested case.

The Trial Court decision was entered on February 25, 2009 and received by Appellant on February 27, 2009. Under Appellate Procedure Rule 2, a party has ten business days from the date of receipt of the final original hearing body decision to file a Notice of Appeal. In this case, ten business days after February 27, 2009 fell on March 13, 2009.

There is also an option for a party to file an appeal pursuant to Sec. l.ll-l(g)(0(a) of the Administrative Procedures Act which states an appeal must be filed within 30 business days of entry of final judgment. In this case, final judgment was entered on February 25, 2009. Thirty business days after February 25, 2009 fell on April 8, 2009. Appellant filed its appeal on April 13, 2009, five days too late.

II Decision

The jurisdiction of this body was not timely invoked. Therefore, the matter is dismissed.

The Motions filed in this case are rendered moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Am. Tribal Law 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/native-alliance-corp-v-oneida-retail-division-oneidactapp-2009.