Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Gosnell

676 F. App'x 205
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 16, 2017
DocketNo. 16-2030
StatusPublished

This text of 676 F. App'x 205 (Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Gosnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Gosnell, 676 F. App'x 205 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Howard Antonia Gosnell, Glenda Grant-ham Gosnell, and Robin Gosnell Logan appeal the district court’s order granting judgment on the pleadings for the Appel[206]*206lee on its complaint for a declaratory judgment regarding coverage for an accident caused by an underinsured motorist. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nationwide Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Gosnell, No. 5:15-cv-00071~D, 2016 WL 4480959 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
676 F. App'x 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nationwide-property-casualty-insurance-co-v-gosnell-ca4-2017.