Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Harry C. Arthur

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 13, 2014·No. 01-13-00948-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued February 13, 2014.

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00948-CV ——————————— NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant V. HARRY C. ARTHUR, Appellee

On Appeal from the 151st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2010-11438

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed an “Agreed Motion to Dismiss Appeals,” representing

that they have settled the claims at issue and no longer wish to pursue their

appeals. In accordance with their settlement agreement, they request that we grant their motion; reverse, set aside, and vacate the trial court’s final judgment without

regard to the merits; and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of a take-

nothing judgment. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). No opinion has issued. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c).

Accordingly, we grant the motion. The trial court’s judgment is set aside

without regard to the merits, and the case is remanded to the trial court for

rendition of a take-nothing judgment in accordance with the terms of the parties’

settlement agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). We dismiss any other

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Harry C. Arthur, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Harry C. Arthur (Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Harry C. Arthur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.