Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Spears-Peterson

940 S.W.2d 594, 40 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 64, 1996 Tex. LEXIS 148
Texas Supreme Court·Decided October 18, 1996·No. No. 96-0803·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this mandamus proceeding, we are asked to review the propriety of the trial court’s orders denying severance and abatement of the plaintiffs extra-contractual claims against her automobile insurer. We believe that the trial court should have the opportunity to reconsider its rulings in light of our recent opinion in Liberty Nat’l Fire Ins. Co. v. Akin, 927 S.W.2d 627 (Tex.1996). Accordingly, we overrule the motion for leave to file without considering the merits of the motion or petition for writ of mandamus, and without prejudice to relator again requesting relief from the court of appeals and this Court after the trial court has had an opportunity to reconsider its rulings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Spears-Peterson, 940 S.W.2d 594, 40 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 64, 1996 Tex. LEXIS 148 (Tex. 1996).

940 S.W.2d 594 (Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Spears-Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Liberty National Fire Insurance Co. v. Akin
927 S.W.2d 627 (Texas Supreme Court, 1996)