Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. McLaughlin

429 F.2d 1317
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 17, 1970
DocketNo. 14082
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 429 F.2d 1317 (Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. McLaughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. McLaughlin, 429 F.2d 1317 (4th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The question of permission to drive an automobile and deviation from the scope of permission was submitted to the jury under a fair charge. The jury answered that Danny Ray Meador was driving the vehicle with the permission of the owner under the omnibus clause of the owner’s insurance clause.

We think the question was one upon which reasonable men could differ, and was within the province of the jury. It follows, therefore, that the decision of the district judge to enter judgment notwithstanding the verdict was erroneous.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
429 F.2d 1317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nationwide-mutual-insurance-v-mclaughlin-ca4-1970.