Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Home Insurance Co.
This text of 194 So. 2d 37 (Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Home Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The issue to be resolved by the chancellor in this declaratory decree action was whether a policy issued by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company to Virginia W. Steffey and her husband John F. Steffey, was effectively cancelled with respect to coverage of Virginia W. Steffey by the oral request of her husband after they were legally separated for several years and without the authority, permission or knowledge of his estranged wife, who had been paying the premiums; no notice of cancellation being given to her.
The chancellor concluded that the cancellation was not effective. Jurisdiction under Chapter 87, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. was proper. Millers Mut. F. Ins. Co. of Tex. v. American Fid. F. Ins. Co., Fla.App.1965, 178 So.2d 742. The facts were sufficient to support the conclusions of the chancellor and we affirm.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 So. 2d 37, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nationwide-mutual-insurance-v-home-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1967.