Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Fleming
935 A.2d 1270, 594 Pa. 311, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2361
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 31, 2007·No. Appeal 278 WAL 2007·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
*312 ORDER
AND NOW, this 31st day of October, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether the Superior Court erred as a matter of law in holding that the attorney-client privilege did not apply to a confidential memorandum written by Petitioners’ in-house senior counsel to its senior executives and attorneys which related to pending and future litigation and reflects confidential information previously shared by the client with the attorney, as well as the attorney’s legal advice?
The Petition for Review in the Nature of Mandamus is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Fleming, 935 A.2d 1270, 594 Pa. 311, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2361 (Pa. 2007).
935 A.2d 1270 (Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Fleming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
SERVIS ONE, INC. v. OKS GROUP INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.
E.D. Pennsylvania, 2021
NUPSON v. SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS, LLP
E.D. Pennsylvania, 2021
Twp. Of Worcester v. Office of Open Rec'ds
22 Pa. D. & C.5th 308 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 2011)
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Fleming
992 A.2d 65 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)
Law Office of Douglas T. Harris v. Philadelphia Waterfront Partners, LP
957 A.2d 1223 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)