Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc. v. Disner

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * *

7 NATIONWIDE JUDGMENT RECOVERY, Case No. 2:24-cv-01256-RFB-DJA INC., 8 ORDER Plaintiff, 9 v. 10

11 TODD DISNER, et al.,

12 Defendants.

14 Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 10) of the 15 Honorable Daniel J. Albregts, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on April 11, 2025. A district 16 court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made 17 by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific written objections to the 18 findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). 19 When written objections have been filed the district court is required to “make a de novo 20 determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations 21 to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party 22 fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct “any review,” de novo or 23 otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 24 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by April 25, 2025. No objections 25 have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate 26 Judge’s recommendation. 27 /// 28 ] Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 10) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 5 6 DATED: May 29, 2025. 7 1 < 8 9 RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

-2-