Nationwide Investors, Inc. v. United Office Building, Inc.

14 A.D.2d 833, 220 N.Y.S.2d 625
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 26, 1961·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum: As the Trial Justice indicated in his opinion, there were questions in the case which could not be resolved without the presence in the action, as parties thereto, of the original owners of the controlling stock of the defendant corporation and the purchasers of the stock. In our judgment, the ultimate question of the enforeibility of the alleged contract of sale between the corporate parties could not properly be resolved without having those underlying questions determined. Therefore, the Trial Justice should not have undertaken to make a final disposition of the action on the merits without the joinder of the parties mentioned (cf. Civ. Prac. Act, § 193). The original stockholders and the purchasers of the stock should be joined as parties defendant before a new trial is held. (Appeal from judgment of Niagara Trial Term dismissing plaintiff’s complaint upon the merits in an action for specific performance of contract to sell real property.) Present—Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and McClusky, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nationwide Investors, Inc. v. United Office Building, Inc., 14 A.D.2d 833, 220 N.Y.S.2d 625 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

14 A.D.2d 833 (Nationwide Investors, Inc. v. United Office Building, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Quick v. ABS Realty Corp.
13 A.D.3d 1021 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Meisner v. Crane
131 A.D.2d 934 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)