Nationwide Insurance v. Schneider

916 A.2d 529, 591 Pa. 156, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 265

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nationwide Insurance v. Schneider. Read the opinion of the Court — 599 Pa. 131 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 5, 2007·No. No. 776 MAL 2006·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of February, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issues:

1. Did the Superior Court properly apply the exhaustion rule of UIM litigation to the primary UIM-excess UIM claim contest?

2. Did the Superior Court properly apply the consent to settle rule of UIM motorist litigation in the less than policy limits settlement context?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of February, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issues:

1. Did the Superior Court properly apply the exhaustion rule of UIM litigation to the primary UIM-excess UIM claim contest?

2. Did the Superior Court properly apply the consent to settle rule of UIM motorist litigation in the less than policy limits settlement context?

Nationwide Insurance v. Schneider, 916 A.2d 529, 591 Pa. 156, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 265 (Pa. 2007).

Pincite

916 A.2d 529 (Nationwide Insurance v. Schneider) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.