Nationstar Mtge. LLC v. Islam

2018 NY Slip Op 1172
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 20, 2018
Docket5772N
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 1172 (Nationstar Mtge. LLC v. Islam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nationstar Mtge. LLC v. Islam, 2018 NY Slip Op 1172 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Nationstar Mtge. LLC v Islam (2018 NY Slip Op 01172)
Nationstar Mtge. LLC v Islam
2018 NY Slip Op 01172
Decided on February 20, 2018
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 20, 2018
Renwick, J.P., Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Andrias, Gesmer, JJ.

5772N 452981/15E

[*1] Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

Badrul Islam, et al., Defendants, NY Prime Holding LLC, Defendant-Appellant.


Steven Zalewski & Associates, Kew Gardens (Dustin Bowman of counsel), for appellant.

Sandelands Eyet LLP, New York (Jamie N. Burke of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered on or about December 12, 2016, which denied defendant NY Prime Holding LLC's pre-answer motion to dismiss the complaint as untimely, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant never met its initial burden to show that plaintiff's action is untimely. Plaintiff's predecessor-in-interest accelerated the mortgage and note for the property by commencing a foreclosure action on October 29, 2009, which was subsequently dismissed without prejudice. The applicable six- year limitations period commenced upon filing of the 2009 action (see CDR Créances S.A. v Euro—American Lodging Corp., 43 AD3d 45, 51 [1st Dept 2007]).

The instant action was commenced with the filing of a complaint on October 29, 2015, which, excluding the day upon which the prior action was commenced (see General Construction Law § 20; Turner v City of New York, 94 AD3d 635, 636 [1st Dept 2012]; Tismer v New York Edison Co., 228 NY 156, 163-164 [1920]) was within the applicable six-year statute of limitations (CPLR 213[4]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: FEBRUARY 20, 2018

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tismer v. . New York Edison Co.
126 N.E. 729 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)
CDR Créances v. Euro-American Lodging Corp.
43 A.D.3d 45 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Turner v. City of New York
94 A.D.3d 635 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 1172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nationstar-mtge-llc-v-islam-nyappdiv-2018.