Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Clarke

707 F. App'x 162
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 27, 2017
DocketNo. 17-2095
StatusPublished

This text of 707 F. App'x 162 (Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Clarke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Clarke, 707 F. App'x 162 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Annette Riley Clarke seeks to appeal the district court’s order remanding a removed foreclosure action to South Carolina state court. “[A] district court may remand a case sua spcrnte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction at any time, 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), and such an order is not reviewable, id. § 1447(d).” Doe v. Blair, 819 F.3d 64, 66-67 (4th Cir. 2016). The district court remanded Clarke’s removed action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, explaining that the complaint did not present a federal question and that diversity of citizenship was lacking. Because the district court remanded the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, we lack jurisdiction to review its order. Id. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doe Ex Rel. Houdersheldt v. Blair
819 F.3d 64 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
707 F. App'x 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nationstar-mortgage-llc-v-clarke-ca4-2017.