Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Martins

240 So. 3d 732
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 7, 2018·No. No. 4D17–1140·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Damoorgian, J.

After establishing that Nationstar Mortgage, LLC ("Nationstar") was not the holder of the note secured by his property at the time it filed a mortgage foreclosure suit and, therefore, lacked standing to maintain its suit, Joselito Martins sought and was awarded fees pursuant to the attorneys' fees clause in the mortgage and the reciprocal provision of section 57.105(7), Florida Statutes (2017). Because "[a] party that prevails on its argument that dismissal is required because the plaintiff lacked standing to sue upon the contract cannot recover fees based upon a provision in that same contract," we reverse and direct the trial court to vacate the final judgment awarding fees to Mr. Martins.

*733Nationstar Mortg. LLC v. Glass , 219 So.3d 896, 899 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) ; see also Christiana Tr., a Div. of Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y, FSB for Normandy Mortg. Loan Tr., Series 2013-18 v. Rushlow , 231 So.3d 558, 559 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Reversed and remanded.

Taylor and May, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Martins, 240 So. 3d 732 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

240 So. 3d 732 (Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Martins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related