Nationsbanc Mortgage Corp. v. Weintraub

26 A.D.3d 318, 809 N.Y.S.2d 913
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 7, 2006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, Suffern Realty Associates Corp. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Smith, J.), dated March 29, 2005, as, in effect, upon granting renewal, adhered to the original determination set forth in two orders of the same court (Bergerman, J.), both dated September 20, 2004, inter alia, granting the plaintiffs motion to hold it in default of the terms of a foreclosure sale.

Ordered that the order dated March 29, 2005, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly adhered to its original determination in its prior orders dated September 20, 2004.

[319] The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Goldstein, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nationsbanc Mortgage Corp. v. Weintraub, 26 A.D.3d 318, 809 N.Y.S.2d 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

26 A.D.3d 318 (Nationsbanc Mortgage Corp. v. Weintraub) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Suffern Realty Associates Corp. v. Garewal
41 A.D.3d 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)