Nations v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Nations v. Hall

95 S.E. 380, 22 Ga. App. 93, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 163

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 15, 1918

Docket9208

StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E. 380 (Nations v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nations v. Hall, 95 S.E. 380, 22 Ga. App. 93, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 163 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The petition for certiorari alleged facts which, perhaps, raised meritoriously the ^question as to the jurisdiction of the court over the parties litigant; but from the answer of the justice of the peace it appears that the case was tried by him under an agreement, the answer being as follows: “Replying specifically to .the allegations in said petition, respondent says: the said case was docketed by Squire G. D. Bandy. At the May term, 1917, the ease was turned over ,to this respondent by agreement of all parties, to be tried by him, and respondent had nothing to do with the case before said May term;-” etc. The answer was untraversed. It was not error to overrule the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., eoneur.

Certiorari; from Gordon superior court—Judge Tarver. August 27, 1917.

George A. Coffee, A. L. Henson, for plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The petition for certiorari alleged facts which, perhaps, raised meritoriously the ^question as to the jurisdiction of the court over the parties litigant; but from the answer of the justice of the peace it appears that the case was tried by him under an agreement, the answer being as follows: “Replying specifically to .the allegations in said petition, respondent says: the said case was docketed by Squire G. D. Bandy. At the May term, 1917, the ease was turned over ,to this respondent by agreement of all parties, to be tried by him, and respondent had nothing to do with the case before said May term;-” etc. The answer was untraversed. It was not error to overrule the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., eoneur.

Certiorari; from Gordon superior court—Judge Tarver. August 27, 1917.

George A. Coffee, A. L. Henson, for plaintiff in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 S.E. 380, 22 Ga. App. 93, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nations-v-hall-gactapp-1918.