National Wildlife Federation v. United States Forest Service, and Davidson Industries, Inc., Defendants-Intervenors/appellees

Ninth Circuit

National Wildlife Federation v. United States Forest Service, and Davidson Industries, Inc., Defendants-Intervenors/appellees

801 F.2d 360, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 32414, 17 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 30, 1986

Docket84-4274

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 801 F.2d 360 (National Wildlife Federation v. United States Forest Service, and Davidson Industries, Inc., Defendants-Intervenors/appellees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Wildlife Federation v. United States Forest Service, and Davidson Industries, Inc., Defendants-Intervenors/appellees, 801 F.2d 360, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 32414, 17 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20 (9th Cir. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Report, we vacate the last clause of paragraph six of the district court’s amended judgment, to wit, the words: “or in the alternative, the federal defendants must include a worst case analysis and an analysis of cumulative impacts in the environmental assessment *361 for each timeber sale in the Seven Year Action Plan.” Pursuant to the Forest Service’s concessions at oral argument, and upon our resolution of the issues on appeal which the parties have been unable to settle, we also vacate all of paragraph seven of the district court’s amended judgment. The remainder of the judgment shall remain in effect. The appeal is dismissed.

This order is filed concurrently with an unpublished memorandum disposition, 803 F.2d 724, 9th Cir.R. 21.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Report, we vacate the last clause of paragraph six of the district court’s amended judgment, to wit, the words: “or in the alternative, the federal defendants must include a worst case analysis and an analysis of cumulative impacts in the environmental assessment *361 for each timeber sale in the Seven Year Action Plan.” Pursuant to the Forest Service’s concessions at oral argument, and upon our resolution of the issues on appeal which the parties have been unable to settle, we also vacate all of paragraph seven of the district court’s amended judgment. The remainder of the judgment shall remain in effect. The appeal is dismissed.

This order is filed concurrently with an unpublished memorandum disposition, 803 F.2d 724, 9th Cir.R. 21.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

801 F.2d 360, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 32414, 17 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-wildlife-federation-v-united-states-forest-service-and-davidson-ca9-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack