National Wildlife Federation v. United States Forest Service, and Davidson Industries, Inc., Defendants-Intervenors/appellees

801 F.2d 360, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 32414, 17 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 30, 1986·No. 84-4274·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Report, we vacate the last clause of paragraph six of the district court’s amended judgment, to wit, the words: “or in the alternative, the federal defendants must include a worst case analysis and an analysis of cumulative impacts in the environmental assessment *361 for each timeber sale in the Seven Year Action Plan.” Pursuant to the Forest Service’s concessions at oral argument, and upon our resolution of the issues on appeal which the parties have been unable to settle, we also vacate all of paragraph seven of the district court’s amended judgment. The remainder of the judgment shall remain in effect. The appeal is dismissed.

This order is filed concurrently with an unpublished memorandum disposition, 803 F.2d 724, 9th Cir.R. 21.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Wildlife Federation v. United States Forest Service, and Davidson Industries, Inc., Defendants-Intervenors/appellees, 801 F.2d 360, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 32414, 17 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20 (9th Cir. 1986).

801 F.2d 360 (National Wildlife Federation v. United States Forest Service, and Davidson Industries, Inc., Defendants-Intervenors/appellees) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wind River Multiple-Use Advocates v. Espy
835 F. Supp. 1362 (D. Wyoming, 1993)
Intermountain Forest Industry Ass'n v. Lyng
683 F. Supp. 1330 (D. Wyoming, 1988)