National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Bradshaw

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio
DecidedMarch 28, 2025
Docket1:24-cv-00937
StatusUnknown

This text of National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Bradshaw (National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Bradshaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Bradshaw, (N.D. Ohio 2025).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE ) CASE NO. 1:24-CV-00937-PAB COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., ) ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE PAMELA A. BARKER ) vs. ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE ) JONATHAN D. GREENBERG REBECCA BRADSHAW, et al., ) ) REPORT & RECOMMENDATION Defendants.

On January 24, 2025, the Court referred Plaintiff’s Garnishment Motions (Doc. Nos. 42-43) to the undersigned for a report and recommendation. (Doc. No. 44.) On January 29, 2025, the Court issued an Order and Notice of Garnishment of Property Other Than Personal Earnings and Answer of Garnishee Form to PNC Bank. (Doc. No. 47.) PNC Bank returned an Answer of Garnishee stating that it did not have more than $400 in money, property, or credits, other than personal earnings, of the judgment debtor under its control and in its possession, and that there were no funds available. (Doc. No. 59.) On March 18, 2025, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Dissolve Writ of Garnishment as to PNC Bank since PNC’s Answer of Garnishee stated that it did not possess any funds subject to garnishment. (Doc. No. 58.) Having reviewed PNC’s Answer of Garnishee stating there are no funds subject to garnishment, the Magistrate Judge recommends the Court dissolve the Writ of Garnishment as to PNC Bank.

Date: March 28, 2025 s/ Jonathan Greenberg Jonathan D. Greenberg United States Magistrate Judge OBJECTIONS Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Courts within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this document. Failure to file objections within the specified time may forfeit the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Berkshire v. Beauvais, 928 F.3d 520, 530-31 (6th Cir. 2019).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Randy Berkshire v. Debra Dahl
928 F.3d 520 (Sixth Circuit, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Bradshaw, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-union-fire-insurance-company-of-pittsburgh-pa-v-bradshaw-ohnd-2025.