National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. State Bank of Long Island

263 A.D.2d 490, 693 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7897
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 12, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 263 A.D.2d 490 (National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. State Bank of Long Island) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. State Bank of Long Island, 263 A.D.2d 490, 693 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In a turnover proceeding pursuant to' CPLR 5225 and 5239, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., appeals, as limited by its brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated November 5, 1997, which, inter alia, found an assignment of certain lottery proceeds to be valid.

Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the petition which was to direct the State Bank of Long Island to turn over money received after 1996 pursuant to a security agreement entered into with Dorit Avni dated July 9, 1993 and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the petition; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to appellant and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Nassau County, for the entry of an appropriate judgment.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the assignment of [491]*491certain lottery proceeds to the State Bank of Long Island was valid in that it was made pursuant to an “appropriate judicial order” (Tax Law § 1613 [a]; see also, Matter of Guri, 247 AD2d 388). However, the Supreme Court erred in denying that branch of the appellant’s petition which was to direct the State Bank of Long Island to turn over money received after 1996 pursuant to a security agreement the bank entered into with Dorit Avni dated July 9, 1993, inasmuch as that agreement was beyond the purview of a “so ordered” stipulation dated August 12, 1992.

The parties’ remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prosperity Partners, Inc. v. Bonilla
374 F. Supp. 2d 290 (E.D. New York, 2005)
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. State Bank of Long Island
6 A.D.3d 439 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 A.D.2d 490, 693 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-union-fire-insurance-co-of-pittsburgh-v-state-bank-of-long-nyappdiv-1999.