National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Diaz-Paez
502 So. 2d 74, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 487, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6684
Opinion
We agree with the appellant, National Union, that the factual issue of a knowing rejection of uninsured motorist coverage remains in this case. It was error, therefore, for the trial court to have granted summary judgment. See Commercial Union Ins. Co. v. Velazquez, 464 So.2d 210 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).
[75] Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Diaz-Paez, 502 So. 2d 74, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 487, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6684 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
502 So. 2d 74 (National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Diaz-Paez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. Velazquez
464 So. 2d 210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)